The use of long range acoustic devices (LRAD) at the Greek-turkish border

According to media reports, sound cannons are being used on the Greek-Turkish border to stop illegal immigration into these areas. In general, a complete range of new technologies is being employed here to protect the borders and to prevent illegal immigration. How much is invested here and who decides on the resources used? What are the health consequences for refugees who are confronted with this material? Our deputy Gusty Graas has inquired at the relevant ministry.

« La crise du Covid-19 ayant fait chuter l’afflux migratoire en Europe durant un certain temps, il est très probable que le nombre de réfugiés reverra un développement vers la hausse.

Selon des reportages récents (DW, Tagesschau), l’Union Européenne se serait doté de moyens digitaux pour mieux assurer la protection de ses frontières. Ainsi, en Grèce, la police à la frontière gréco-turque déploierait des canons sonores afin de repousser les vagues de migrants et réfugiés irréguliers qui tentent de franchir la frontière. D’autres moyens technologiques prévus seraient des caméras et des drones pour observer la frontière et l’exploitation d’intelligence artificielle pour procéder à des interrogatoires. Selon DW, l’Union européenne aurait planifié d’investir un montant important entre 2021 et 2027 dans ces infrastructures que certaines publications de presse qualifient de « forteresse digitale ».

D’après les informations, les canons sonores, nommés ‘LRAD – Long range accoustic device’ concentrent des faisceaux à haut décibel, pouvant atteindre jusqu’à 162db en volume. Étant donné que la santé d’une personne peut souffrir des troubles auditifs dès 85db voire moins, le volume maximal des canons sonores pourrait, selon les rapports afférents, créer des bruits douloureux, désorienter les personnes et causer une multitude de sévères problèmes de santé et lésions corporelles aux victimes. 

Dans ce contexte, j’aimerais poser les questions suivantes à Monsieur le Ministre des Affaires étrangères et européennes :

  • Est-il vrai que de tels canons sonores sont utilisés à la frontière gréco-turque ?
  • Dans l’affirmative, comment ces moyens ont-ils été financés ?
  • Encore dans l’affirmative, qui contrôle l’exploitation de ces moyens ?
  • Quels investissements sont prévus au niveau de l’Union européenne afin de surveiller les mouvements migratoires jusqu’à 2030 ?
  • Monsieur le Ministre est-il favorable à un financement de telles mesures répressives ?
  • Considérant les conséquences que peuvent avoir les canons sonores sur la santé des victimes – qui en assume la responsabilité ? »

Answer

The operation and control of the sound cannons as well as the responsibility lie with the Greek authorities. In the context of the EU’s 2021-2027 multiannual framework, spending on border management will total EUR 12.7 billion. Of this amount, 7.2 billion euros will be allocated to decentralized agencies, including the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex). The minister is clearly opposed to the use of means that could call into question the principle of non-refoulement as well as the right to seek international protection within the European Union.

Would you like this parliamentary question to be translated into English?

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
WhatsApp

More parliamentary questions

How many doctors work in the north of the country?

In the north of the country, citizens often have to travel long distances to get to a clinic or medical centre.
DP MPs André Bauler and Gilles Baum asked the Minister for Health, among other things, how many GPs and specialists work in the north of the country, what the age pyramid is for doctors and when a second medical centre might open in the north.

read more...

How many women are released from work during pregnancy?

Labour law stipulates that pregnant women may not take on certain tasks at work. The law therefore provides for an adjustment of the workplace or a transfer to another position. If neither is possible, the woman must be released from work.
DP MPs Corinne Cahen and Carole Hartmann wanted to know from the Minister of Health, among other things, how many women are exempted per sector, how often an employer has objected to a dispensation and on the basis of which specific criteria occupational physicians decide on a dispensation.

read more...

Should the LNS and private laboratories work closer together on biopsies?

The LNS, which has a monopoly in this area, has taken a number of measures to counteract the long waiting times for the evaluation of biopsies.
DP MPs Mandy Minella and Dr Gérard Schockmel have asked the Minister of Health what impact these measures have had on waiting times and whether greater cooperation with private laboratories should be considered in order to further reduce waiting times.

read more...

No more reimbursement for dermatoscopic photos?

As part of a dermatologist’s examination, photos can be taken of suspicious skin areas where there is a risk of skin cancer developing. DP MP Gusty Graas has now been informed that these photos will no longer be reimbursed by health insurance. In a parliamentary question to the Minister of Health, the liberal politician would like to know, among other things, why this decision was made and how many patients have been reimbursed for such photos taken by dermatologists in the last five years.

read more...