A right to be forgotten for certain diseases?

The right to be forgotten in the context of outstanding balance insurance has been in place since January 2020. A monitoring and re-evaluation committee was set up to ensure that the provisions of the agreement are properly applied and that the parties' commitments are respected. It is in this context that our Member of Parliament Gusty Graas has put a series of questions to the Minister of Health.

« Le 1er janvier 2020 est entrée en vigueur une convention entre le ministère de la Santé et l’Association des Compagnies d’Assurance et de Réassurance (ACA), mettant en œuvre un dispositif « droit à l’oubli » dans le cadre de l’assurance solde restant dû.

L’objectif de cette convention est entre autres de faciliter l’accès à cette assurance aux personnes présentant un risque aggravé en raison d’une pathologie cancéreuse, d’une infection virale à l’hépatite C ou d’une infection par le VIH.

Un Comité de suivi et de réévaluation fut instauré afin de veiller à la bonne application des dispositions de la convention et au respect des engagements des parties.

Dans ce contexte, j’aimerais poser les questions suivantes à Madame la Ministre de la Santé :

  • Madame la Ministre, dispose-t-elle des chiffres de personnes ayant pu accéder à une assurance solde restant dû grâce à la convention mentionnée ci-dessus ?
  • Le Comité de suivi a-t-il reçu toutes les données statistiques de l’année 2020 des compagnies d’assurance signataires, comme l’exige la convention ? Dans l’affirmative, quelles conclusions peuvent être tirées de ces données ?
  • Est-il éventuellement prévu d’élargir le droit à l’oubli à d’autres pathologies ?
  • Par combien de réclamations le Comité de suivi a-t-il été saisi l’année dernière ? Quelles ont été les suites réservées à ces réclamations ? »

Would you like this parliamentary question to be translated into English?

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
WhatsApp

More parliamentary questions

How many doctors work in the north of the country?

In the north of the country, citizens often have to travel long distances to get to a clinic or medical centre.
DP MPs André Bauler and Gilles Baum asked the Minister for Health, among other things, how many GPs and specialists work in the north of the country, what the age pyramid is for doctors and when a second medical centre might open in the north.

read more...

How many women are released from work during pregnancy?

Labour law stipulates that pregnant women may not take on certain tasks at work. The law therefore provides for an adjustment of the workplace or a transfer to another position. If neither is possible, the woman must be released from work.
DP MPs Corinne Cahen and Carole Hartmann wanted to know from the Minister of Health, among other things, how many women are exempted per sector, how often an employer has objected to a dispensation and on the basis of which specific criteria occupational physicians decide on a dispensation.

read more...

Should the LNS and private laboratories work closer together on biopsies?

The LNS, which has a monopoly in this area, has taken a number of measures to counteract the long waiting times for the evaluation of biopsies.
DP MPs Mandy Minella and Dr Gérard Schockmel have asked the Minister of Health what impact these measures have had on waiting times and whether greater cooperation with private laboratories should be considered in order to further reduce waiting times.

read more...

No more reimbursement for dermatoscopic photos?

As part of a dermatologist’s examination, photos can be taken of suspicious skin areas where there is a risk of skin cancer developing. DP MP Gusty Graas has now been informed that these photos will no longer be reimbursed by health insurance. In a parliamentary question to the Minister of Health, the liberal politician would like to know, among other things, why this decision was made and how many patients have been reimbursed for such photos taken by dermatologists in the last five years.

read more...