DP Logo
Join us
DP Logo
Join us
Join us

Is neurosurgical care deteriorating for patients in Luxembourg?

Recently, the nomenclature for neurosurgical procedures was changed so that intracranial procedures are only reimbursed in the CHL, and no longer in the HRS. The DP MPs Gilles Baum and Gusty Graas asked the minister responsible, among other things, whether this change would not lead to a deterioration in the care of patients and whether the minister was not prepared to have this change re-examined.

Question

« En date du 10 mai 2023, le Conseil médical des Hôpitaux Robert Schuman (HRS) a envoyé une lettre à Madame la Ministre de la Santé, Paulette Lenert, où il dénonce le procédé d’un changement de nomenclature des actes de neurochirurgie.

Plus précisément, ce changement réserve le remboursement de certains actes de neurochirurgie intracrânienne au seul Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (CHL). Et ce, bien que les HRS disposent depuis 25 ans d’une équipe de neurochirurgiens qui effectuent les mêmes traitements.

À ce sujet, nous aimerions poser les questions suivantes à Monsieur le Ministre de la Sécurité sociale :

  • Monsieur le Ministre, est-il au courant du changement de la nomenclature des actes de chirurgie mentionné ci-dessus ?
  • Monsieur le Ministre, n’est-il pas d’avis que ce changement représente une dégradation de la prise en charge neurochirurgicale des patients ?
  • Monsieur le Ministre, peut-il confirmer l’accusation du Conseil médical des HRS selon lequel l’AMMD fut délibérément mal informée en affirmant que tous les neurochirurgiens du pays ont donné leur accord au changement mentionné ?
  • Monsieur le Ministre, estime-t-il qu’il s’agit d’un conflit d’intérêt lorsque le directeur du CHL, en sa qualité de représentant de la FHL, soutient l’attribution d’un monopole de certains actes de neurochirurgie au CHL ? Dans la négative, pour quelles raisons ? Dans l’affirmative, comment monsieur le Ministre souhaite-t-il éviter une telle situation à l’avenir ?
  • Monsieur le Ministre, est-il disposé à entamer un réexamen du changement de la nomenclature des actes de neurochirurgies intracrânienne ? Dans la négative, pour quelles raisons ? »
Download question

Would you like this parliamentary question to be translated into English?

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
WhatsApp

More parliamentary questions

Administrative burden in primary education

Despite the Ministry of Education’s efforts to simplify administrative tasks in primary schools, unions point to a growing bureaucratic burden on teachers. What is the actual situation on the ground, and how might artificial intelligence play a role? A parliamentary question from our MPs Gilles Baum and Barbara Agostino seeks answers.

read more...

Second classroom support staff and A-EBS in cycle 1 of primary education

To ensure more effective pedagogical differentiation from the start of schooling, the coalition agreement foresees the gradual introduction of a second classroom support worker in cycle 1. This second staff member could also play a key role in the rollout of Project Alpha, especially in preparing children for literacy in German or French. Furthermore, assistants for pupils with special educational needs (A-EBS) are set to ease the workload of specialised teachers. Our MPs Gilles Baum and Barbara Agostino have submitted a parliamentary question to the Minister to clarify the implementation timeline and progress of these initiatives.

read more...

How many people suffer from anorexia?

In addition to obesity, anorexia is also a problem in our society. DP MPs André Bauler and Gilles Baum asked the Minister of Health, among other things, how many anorexia patients in Luxembourg had to be hospitalised, how long treatment lasts on average, and how treatment costs have developed over the last ten years.

read more...

No access to biological results in the LëtzHBM study?

As part of the LNS study ‘LëtzHBM’, biological and environmental samples are collected to determine the presence of chemical substances in private households. The results of the biological samples, unlike the environmental samples, are not systematically communicated to the participants.
DP MP Dr Gérard Schockmel has asked the Minister of Health why these results are not communicated and whether this is compatible with data protection regulations.

read more...